TRUTHER NOVEMBER 16, 2012
According to the UN Population Fund (UNPF) Annual Report, family planning (i.e. population control) is a human right and therefore under jurisdiction of the UN to be dispensed throughout the world. Dr. Babatunde Osotimehin, director if the UNPF explains: “Family planning has a positive multiplier effect on development. Not only does the ability for a couple to choose when and how many children to have help lift nations out of poverty, but it is also one of the most effective means of empowering women. Women who use contraception are generally healthier, better educated, more empowered in their households and communities and more economically productive. Women’s increased labor-force participation boosts nations’ economies.”
By declaring that legal, cultural and financial “barriers” are impeding on women’s rights by keeping contraceptives and designated family planning programs from being accessed by women on a global scale. The UN has taken upon themselves to impose this eugenics agenda under the cover of a “fundamental human right” and seek to preserve that right above independent sovereign nation’s laws.
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon asserts that contraceptives need to be accessed by teenage girls (or younger) to prevent “unintended pregnancies, unsafe abortions and sexually transmitted infections.” Ban says that: “Sixteen million adolescent girls become mothers every year, and every day, more than 2,000 young people contract HIV. We have a collective responsibility to drive these numbers down.”
Ban stated that the international community must take this challenge to provide abortion services and contraceptives to children because “we cannot ignore the facts. Many young people are sexually active . . . they may face risks to their health, including sexual violence.”
The UNPF report stated that by 2020, 3 million fewer babies would be born if their efforts to control pregnancies through contraceptives were successful. As outlined in the UN Millennium Development Goal 5, access to contraceptive supplies must be utilized to prevent all “unwanted pregnancies”. The Global Program to Enhance Reproductive Health Commodity Security document reveals the UN’s plan to coerce sovereign governments to “ensure access to a reliable supply of contraceptives, condoms, medicine and equipment for family planning, prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections and maternal health.”
In 2011, the UN announced that “family planning, secured by a steady supply of contraceptives, is a national priority for saving women’s lives.”
Population stabilization, the true meaning behind family planning is evident in the World Bank and UN Population Fund’s push against sovereign nations to reduce their populations by rule of the “global consensus” which dictates human rights policy by deeming some fit to live and others not.
Based on the Rockefeller Commission report, population stabilization is an endeavor worth pursuing, although its success would take decades because of the high incidents of reproduction by marriage. However, with the destruction of the family, this problem could be solved. Furthermore, the stabilization of the global population would reallocate resources to be better spent in terms of quality versus quantity.
Concluding that the best way to achieve population stabilization is to coerce the nation’s citizens that they freely choose abortion and not having a child at all as part of an acceptable societal norm. By way of implementation of social barrier and cultural pressures, the average citizen would rather go with the flow and chose not to procreate for the sake of being part of the herd.
Simultaneously, by reforming the acceptable amount of children born into a married household, the impact ofpopulation growth would seem to be natural. And trends would take care of social conformity. Those who had more children would be shunned.
Increasing access to abortion clinics with the inception and popularity of Planned Parenthood would give unacceptable pregnancies a viable solution. This would distract and control another Baby Boom from occurring.
Using images on television, film and print media control the ideals of the modern family to fit the model of a population stabilized by no longer being plagued with “run-a-way” births; but focusing on the example of small-families as the best way to go.
The UNPF report also states that over population has a drastically negative cost to the world’s economy – evidenced in the %5.7 billion that could be saved should less people be alive to necessitate the costs of living; as well as the significant drop in poverty levels and need for medical care. Therefore by providing the 222 million women around the world with contraceptive services, there would be less babies being born after a generation or two; wherein significant population reduction would be obvious.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported recently that 2011 had the lowest birth rates on record. Across the board, infiltrating all races in the US, fewer children are being born. Since 2007, 4.3 million Americans have had fewer babies; either due to the economy or social credo.
To ensure a drastic reduction in pregnancies, the UNPF must raise $4.1 billion annually to provide contraceptives to every woman in developing nations to stabilize their populations.
In the 1970’s the UK, World Bank and the US combined efforts to organize a mass sterilization campaign which used foreign “aid” to fund their efforts.
Champion eugenicist Melinda Gates, co-founder of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, believes she can prevent 40% of people who would otherwise have been born, there by justifying family planning as a scheme to make women healthier who have “families are more successful and their communities are more prosperous.”
In classifying pregnancies manifesting uncontrollably in under-developed nations as “unwanted” Gates is focusing on eventually eliminating this number to reduce the world’s population. Africa, a big focus for the BMGF is being targeted along with Muslim nations.
Gates has partnered with drug corporations like Shanghai Dahua Pharmaceuticals in China to develop implantable fertility controls that will be used in over 20 developing countries to curb population growth.
Pharmaceutical giant Merck announced in a formal statement that they will donate $25 million over an 8 year period as a “Merck for Mothers” campaign in line with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation depopulation agenda. Both Merck and Gates have outlined a plan that focuses on 3 “key areas”:
· Using propaganda in the mainstream media to gain public support for reducing the world’s population
· Employ drug and private-sector corporations to ensure “family planning” resources can be utilized in under-developed nations
· Coerce governments, corporations and “civil society” to support the social meme of over-population and the BMGF remedies for quelling this problem
Nearly 20 years ago, the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) declared that universal education, reduction of infant births, protection of maternal mortality as an excuse to sterilize millions of women, and purveying “family planning” as a cover for preventing the most densely populated areas from continuing to freely procreate were the most effective course of action to ensure the depopulation agenda was successful.
Now the ICPD Beyond 2014 offers a “global consensus on the human populations” as a policy to guide reproduction under the guidelines of social progress and environmental sustainability because “human beings are at the center of development.”
The Global Strategy for Women’s and Children’s Health, working with the World Health Organization (WHO) is a global plan to bring vaccines, international interventions and financing to the UN for the purpose of:
· Controlling access to healthcare in under-developed nations
· Use pre-determined drug corporations to treat third world nations so that they are no longer allowed to freely procreate
· Monitor and evaluate the progress of depopulation in these areas
Susanne Posel’s Website is Occupy Corporatism.
Canadian Doctor. H1N1 Vaccination: A Eugenics Weapon for “Massive & Targeted Reduction of the World Population.”
By Kurt Nimmo
Global Research, July 10, 2009
Prison Planet 8 July 2009
Theme: Crimes against Humanity
Canadian doctor Ghislaine Lanctôt, author of the Medical Mafia, has underscored the lawsuit recently filed by Austrian journalistJane Bürgermeister against the WHO, the UN, and several high ranking government and corporate officials. Bürgermeister has documented how an international corporate criminal syndicate plans to unleash a deadly flu virus and institute a forced vaccination program.
“I am emerging from a long silence on the subject of vaccination, because I feel that, this time, the stakes involved are huge. The consequences may spread much further than anticipated,” writes Lanctôt, who believes the A(H1N1) virus will be used in a pandemic concocted and orchestrated by the WHO, an international organization that serves military, political and industrial interests.
Lanctôt warns that the elite and their minions will introduce a compulsory vaccination that will contain a deadly virus and this will be used specifically as a eugenics weapon for “massive and targeted reduction of the world population.” Moreover, a pandemic will also be used to further establish martial law and a police state, according to Lanctôt, and activate concentration camps “built to accommodate the rebellious” and eventually transfer power from all nations to a single United Nations government and thus fulfill the sinister plans of the New World Order.
Swine Flu 1976 & Propaganda
In her book The Medical Mafia, Lanctôt writes about the ineffectiveness and dangers of vaccination. “Because of my professional status, my words weighed significantly in the public eye. The Medical Board’s reaction was immediate and strong. Its leaders demanded that I resign as a physician. I answered that I would do so as long as they could prove that what I had written was false. The Medical Board replied with a call for my expulsion,” she writes. “As I witnessed the disproportionate reaction of the Medical Board, I realized that, for the health establishment, the subject of vaccination was taboo. Unknowingly, I had opened a Pandora’s box. I discovered that, despite official claims, vaccines have nothing to do with public health. Underneath the governmental stamp of approval, there are deep military, political and industrial interests.”
During her trial in 1995, Lanctôt used an episode from the March 11th, 1979, 60 Minutes TV show covering the massive vaccination program foisted on the American public supposedly in response to the 1976 swine flu outbreak. It was later established by the CDC that the virus originated out of Fort Dix in New Jersey. “The Fort Dix outbreak may have been a zoonotic anomaly caused by introduction of an animal virus into a stressed population in close contact in crowded facilities during a cold winter,” note Joel C. Gaydos, Franklin H. Top, Jr, Richard A. Hodder, and Philip K. Russell.
It was also characterized “a rare example of an influenza virus with documented human to human transmission,” according to Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore. The virus is “thought to be a direct descendant of the virus that caused the pandemic of 1918,” explainedRichard Krause, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the time.
“Public health experts, fearing a possible replay of the 1918 pandemic, engaged in an intense debate about how to respond. Eventually they launched a nationwide vaccination campaign, which was announced by President Gerald Ford in March. By the end of the year, 48 million people had been vaccinated,” write Robert Roos and Lisa Schnirring of the Center for Infectious Disease Research & Policy. “But the feared pandemic never materialized.”
Instead, numerous people came down with Guillian-Barre syndrome, a paralyzing neurologic illness, after receiving the government-hyped vaccination.
More than 33 years later, according to Dr. Russell Blaylock, a board certified neurosurgeon, “we are hearing the same cries of alarm from a similar lineup of virology experts. The pharmaceutical companies are busy designing a vaccine for the swine flu in hope that this administration will make the vaccine mandatory before another vaccine-related disaster can ruin their party…. Like SARS and bird flu before it, this swine flu scare is a lot of nonsense. Just take your high dose vitamin D3 (5000 IU a day), eat a healthy diet and take a few immune boosting supplements (such as beta-1, 3/1, 6 glucan) and you will not have to worry about this flu.”
According to a source known to former NSA official Wayne Madsen, “A top scientist for the United Nations, who has examined the outbreak of the deadly Ebola virus in Africa, as well as HIV/AIDS victims, concluded that H1N1 possesses certain transmission “vectors” that suggest that the new flu strain has been genetically-manufactured as a military biological warfare weapon.
In April, Army criminal investigators were looking into the possibility that disease samples went missing from biolabs at Fort Detrick. “Chad Jones, spokesman for Fort Meade, said CID is investigating the possibility of missing virus samples from the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases,” the Frederick News Post reported. “Obviously, in light of the current swine flu scare, and the new strain’s possible synthetic origin, the fact that virus samples may have gone missing from the same Army research lab from which the 2001 anthrax strain was released is extremely disturbing,” Paul Joseph Watson wrote at the time.
Jane Bürgermeister “charges that the entire ’swine flu’ pandemic business is premised on a massive lie that there is no natural virus out there that poses a threat to the population,” writesBarbara Minton for Natural Health News. “She presents evidence leading to the belief that the bird flu and swine flu viruses have, in fact, been bioengineered in laboratories using funding supplied by the WHO and other government agencies, among others. This ’swine flu’ is a hybrid of part swine flu, part human flu and part bird flu, something that can only come from laboratories according to many experts.”
Using the “swine flu” as a pretext, the defendants [in Bürgermeister's lawsuit] have preplanned the mass murder of the U.S. population by means of forced vaccination. They have installed an extensive network of FEMA concentration camps and identified mass grave sites, and they have been involved in devising and implementing a scheme to hand power over the U.S. to an international crime syndicate that uses the UN and WHO as a front for illegal racketeering influenced organized crime activities, in violation of the laws that govern treason.
Obama’s Bilderberg Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius — and Bilderberg member — wants to make it easy for kids to get their toxin-laden eugenicist “swine flu” vaccine this fall. “Schoolchildren may be first in line for swine flu vaccine this fall — and might even be able to get the shot right at school,” the Associated Press reported on June 16.
As we noted last month, the government appears to be planning a mandatory flu vaccination program. In a recent article on the unfolding economic collapse, Rep. Ron Paul warns that the hysterically hyped H1N1 flu “pandemic” may result in the government requiring mandatory flu vaccinations. “Nearly $8 billion will be spent to address a ‘potential pandemic flu’ which could result in mandatory vaccinations for no discernible reason other than to enrich the pharmaceutical companies that make the vaccine,” writes Paul.Considering the track record of the global elite, the government-mandated vaccination program now in the works — as Ghislaine Lanctôt and Jane Bürgermeister warn — will serve the eugenicist plan to depopulate the planet. A contrived pandemic will also set the final stage for the implementation of
Rockefeller-Funded Anti-Fertility Vaccine Coordinated by WHO
Global Research, September 04, 2010
Prison Planet.com 27 August 2010
In addition to the recent PrisonPlanet-exclusive Rockefeller Foundation Developed Vaccines For “Mass-Scale” Fertility Reduction — which outlines the Rockefeller Foundation’s efforts in the 1960s funding research into so-called “anti-fertility vaccines”– another series of documents has surfaced, proving beyond any doubt that the UN Population Fund, World Bank and World Health Organization picked up on it, further developing it under responsibility of a “Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation”.
Just four years after the Rockefeller Foundation launched massive funding-operations into anti-fertility vaccines, the Task Force was created under auspices of the World Health Organization, World Bank and UN Population Fund. Its mission, according to one of its members, to support:
“basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines directed against the gametes or the preimplantation embryo. These studies have involved the use of advanced procedures in peptide chemistry, hybridoma technology and molecular genetics as well as the evaluation of a number of novel approaches in general vaccinology. As a result of this international, collaborative effort, a prototype anti-HCG vaccine is now undergoing clinical testing, raising the prospect that a totally new family planning method may be available before the end of the current decade.”
In regards to the scope of the Task Force’s jurisdiction, the Biotechnology and Development Monitorreported:
“The Task Force acts as a global coordinating body for anti-fertility vaccine R&D in the various working groups and supports research on different approaches, such as anti-sperm and anti-ovum vaccines and vaccines designed to neutralize the biological functions of hCG. The Task Force has succeeded in developing a prototype of an anti-hCG-vaccine.”
One of the Task Force members, P.D. Griffin, outlined the purpose and trajectory of these Fertility Regulating Vaccines. Griffin:
“The Task Force has continued to coordinate its research activities with other vaccine development programmes within WHO and with other international and national programmes engaged in the development of fertility regulating vaccines.”
Griffin also admitted to the fact that one of the purposes of the vaccines is the implementation in developing countries. Griffin:
“If vaccines could be developed which could safely and effectively inhibit fertility, without producing unacceptable side effects, they would be an attractive addition to the present armamentarium of fertility regulating methods and would be likely to have a significant impact on family planning programmes.”
Also, one of the advantages of the FRVs over “currently available methods of fertility regulation” the Task Force states, is the following (179):
“low manufacturing cost and ease of delivery within existing health services.”
Already in 1978, the WHO’s Task Force (then called Task Force on Immunological Methods for Fertility Regulation) underlined the usefulness of these vaccines in regards to the possibility of “large scale synthesis and manufacture” of the vaccine:
“The potential advantages of an immunological approach to fertility regulation can be summarized as follows: (a) the possibility of infrequent administration, possibly by paramedical personnel; (b) the use of antigens or antigen fragments, which are not pharmacologically active; and (c) in the case of antigens of known chemical structure, there is the possibility of large-scale synthesis and manufacture of vaccine at relatively low cost.”
In 1976, the WHO Expanded Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction published a report, stating:
“In 1972 the Organization (…) expanded its programme of research in human reproduction to provide an international focus for an intensified effort to improve existing methods of fertility regulation, to develop new methods and to assist national authorities in devising the best ways of providing them on a continuing basis. The programme is closely integrated with other WHO research on the delivery of family planning care by health services, which in turn feeds into WHO’s technical assistance programme to governments at the service level.”
Although the term “Anti-Fertility Vaccine”, coined by the Rockefeller Foundation, was replaced by the more bureaucratic sounding “Fertility Regulating Vaccine (FRV), the programme was obviously the same. Besides, The time line shows conclusively that the WHO, UN Population Fund and World Bank continued on a path outlined by the Rockefellers in the late 1960s. By extensions, it proves that all these organization are perfectly interlocked, best captured under the header “Scientific Dictatorship”. The relationshipbetween the WHO and the Rockefeller Foundation is intense. In the1986 bulletin of the World Health Organization, this relationship is being described in some detail. While researching the effectiveness of “gossypol” as an “antifertility agent”, the bulletin states:
“The Rockefeller Foundation has supported limited clinical trials in China and smallscale clinical studies in Brazil and Austria. The dose administered in the current Chinese trial has been reduced from 20 mg to 10-15 mg/day during the loading phase in order to see if severe oligospermia rather than consistent azoospermia would be adequate for an acceptable, non-toxic and reversible effect. Meanwhile, both the WHO human reproduction programme and the Rockefeller Foundation are supporting animal studies to better define the mechanism of action of gossypol.”
In August of 1992, a series of meetings was held in Geneva, Switzerland, regarding “fertility regulating vaccines”. According to the document Fertility Regulating Vaccines (classified by the WHO with a limited distribution) present at those meetings were scientists and clinicians from all over the globe, including then biomedical researcher of the American Agency for International development, and current research-chief of USAID, Mr. Jeff Spieler.
In 1986 Mr. Spieler declared:
“A new approach to fertility regulation is the development of vaccines directed against human substances required for reproduction. Potential candidates for immunological interference include reproductive hormones, ovum and sperm antigens, and antigens derived from embryonic or fetal tissue.(…). An antifertility vaccine must be capable of safely and effectively inhibiting a human substance, which would need somehow to be rendered antigenic. A fertility-regulating vaccine, moreover, would have to produce and sustain effective immunity in at least 95% of the vaccinated population, a level of protection rarely achieved even with the most successful viral and bacterial vaccines. But while these challenges looked insuperable just a few years ago, recent advances in biotechnology- particularly in the fields of molecular biology, genetic engineering and monoclonal antibody production- are bringing antifertility vaccines into the realm of the feasible.”
“Vaccines interfering with sperm function and fertilization could be available for human testing by the early 1990s”, Spieler wrote.
In order for widespread use of these vaccines, Spieler writes, the vaccine must conquer “variations in individual responses to immunization with fertility-regulating vaccines”.
“Research”, he goes on to say,”is also needed in the field of “basic vaccinology”, to find the best carrier proteins, adjuvants, vehicles and delivery systems.”
In the 1992 document, the problem of “variations in individual responses” is also discussed:
“Because of the genetic diversity of human populations”, states the document, “immune responses to vaccines often show marked differences from one individual to another in terms of magnitude and duration. These differences may be partly or even completely overcome with appropriately engineered FRVs (Fertility Regulating Vaccines) and by improvements in our understanding of what is required to develop and control the immune response elicited by different vaccines.”
The picture emerging from these facts is clear. The WHO, as a global coordinating body, has since the early 70s continued the development of the Rockefeller-funded “anti-fertility vaccine”. What also is becoming clear, is that extensive research has been done to the delivery systems in which these anti-fertility components can be buried, such as regular anti-viral vaccines. It’s a mass-scale anti-fertilization programme with the aim of reducing the world’s population: a dream long cherished by the global elite.
The Early Roots Of Population Control
He went even further to promote the active policy of human culling when he said:
"We should facilitate, instead of foolishly attempting to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality. Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits.
In our towns, we should make the streets more narrow, crowd more people into houses and court the return of the plague. In the country we should build our villages near stagnant pools and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations."
Such atrocious ideas can similarly be found elsewhere. Although we do not agree with some of the ridiculous ideas of David Icke, since he has his own agenda, one of which is to ridicule religion, yet it would be useful to quote from his book 'The Biggest Secret': "The Talmud must be the most racist document on Earth. Here are a few examples: 'The non-Jews have been created to serve the Jews as slaves.'- Midrasch Talpioth 225 'The birth-rate of non-Jews has to be suppressed massively.'- Zohar 11, 4B" (Sterilization, abortion, aids drugs, gay marriages). On page 87 Icke says: "The charging of interests and loans to a fellow Jew is banned, but by Talmudic law they must charge a Gentile (non-Jew) as much interest as they possibly can." The ideas expressed above seem to form the basis for the policies of international banks, leading to the poor living conditions in many third-world countries saddled with unserviceable interest-debts.
By the mid 1970's, indicative of the effectiveness of the new propaganda onslaught from the Anglo-American establishment, US government officials were openly boasting in public press conferences that they were committed "neo- Malthusians", something for which they would have been laughed out of office a mere decade or so earlier. But nowhere did the new embrace of British Malthusian-economics in the United States show itself more brutally than in Kissinger's National Security Council. On April 24, 1974, in the midst of the oil crisis, the White House National Security advisor Henry Alfred Kissinger issued National Security Council Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200), on the subject of "Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for the U.S. Security and Overseas Interests". It was directed to all cabinet secretaries, the military Joint Chiefs of Staff, as well as the CIA and other key agencies. On October 16, 1975, at Kissinger's urging President Gerald Ford issued a memorandum confirming the need for "U.S. leadership in world population matters", based on the contents of the classified (NSSM 200) document. For the first time in American history, the document espoused Malthusianism as an explicitly desirable aim of the security policy of the government of the United States. More bitterly ironic was the fact that it was initiated by a German-born Jew. Even during the years of the Nazi regime in Germany, government officials had greater inhibitions to officially espouse such ruthless policies.
NSSM 200 argued that population expansion in select developing countries which also contain key strategic resources necessary to the U.S. economy posed potential U.S. "national security threats". The study warned that under pressure from an expanding domestic population, countries with needed raw materials will tend to demand better prices and higher terms of trade for their exports to the United States. In this context, the NSSM 200 identified a target list of 13 countries, singled out as "strategic targets" for U.S. efforts at population control. This list was drawn up in 1974. There is no doubt that the selection of countries intended to be victims of this policy was made, as was the case in all other major decisions in which Kissinger played a role, following close consultation with the British Foreign Office. Kissinger explicitly stated in the memorandum, "how much more efficient expenditures for population control might be than [funds for] raising production through direct investments in additional irrigation and power projects and factories."
British 19th Century Imperialism could have expressed it no better. With this secret policy declaration, the government of the United States had committed itself to an agenda which would contribute to its own economic demise as well as untold famine, misery, and unnecessary death throughout the developing sector. The 13 target countries named in Kissinger's study were Brazil, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Egypt, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, Turkey, Ethiopia, and Columbia. The reader is invited to reflect upon the tragic history of these unfortunate 13 since Kissinger drew up the list in late 1974. (Taken from "A Century of War" - William Engdahl-1992)
The word Eugenics is derived from the Greek language to indicate 'good birth' or 'wellborn' as in aristocracy. It is premised on the assumption that those who are not 'wellborn' should not exist! The following statements bear testimony to this type of mentality:
These two quotations are alike in their mock show of concern for human suffering and in their cynical remedy for it: Big Brother must prevent the 'unworthy' or 'unwanted' people from living.
The Bush Family network, Eugenics and Sterilization
Prescott Bush acquired a senior post at the Rockefeller controlled US Rubber Company in 1925. Since then, over the next five decades, three key families team up with the Bush family to develop the Eugenics program. These families are the Farish, Draper and Gray families. Their eugenics program led to the setting up of Nazi Germany with one of its aims being to serve as a huge 'Eugenics laboratory'. "The most important American political event in those preparations for Hitler was the infamous 'Third International Congress on Eugenics,' held at New York's American Museum of Natural History on August 21- 23, 1932. It was supervised by the International Federation of Eugenics Societies. This meeting took up the stubborn persistence of African-Americans and other allegedly 'inferior' and socially inadequate' groups in reproducing, expanding their numbers, and amalgamating with others. lt was recommended that these 'dangers' to the 'better' ethnic groups and to the 'well-born', could be dealt with by sterilization or 'cutting off the bad stock' of the 'unfit'. "The Congress proceedings were dedicated to the mother of Averill Harriman(a Rockefeller financial agent); 'she had paid for the founding of the race science movement in America back in 1910 and building the Eugenics Record Office as a branch of Galton National Laboratory in London. She and other Harriman's were usually escorted to the horse races by old George Herbert Walker (maternal grandfather of George Bush Snr and father-in-law of Prescott Bush) - they shared with the Bushes and the Farishes a fascination with 'breeding thoroughbreds' among horses and humans." (Pg. 48-49 "George Bush-The Unauthorized Biography" by Webster G.Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin-EIR-1992)
John Galton, the cousin of the fraud, Charles Darwin, held the first Eugenics meeting in 1907 and this led to the establishment of the Galton National Laboratory of London. The Eugenics project took off soon after in America where it became one of the primary factors that lead to the establishment of Nazi Germany, with one of its aims being to set up a huge 'Eugenics Laboratory'. This project was funded by the Rockefeller family network (through Averell Harriman, who was one of their financial agents), and assisted by the Bush, Farish, Draper and Gray families). Harriman personally arranged with George Walker(Pres. Bush snr's maternal grandfather)to transport Nazi ideologues from Germany to New York to attend the 'Third International Congress on Eugenics'. held at the American Museum of Natural History on August 21-23, 1932. This meeting dealt with the 'stubborn persistence of African- Americans' and other allegedly 'inferior and socially inadequate groups in reproducing, expanding their numbers and merging with others'. It was recommended that these 'dangers' to the 'better' ethnic groups and to the 'well born' could be dealt with by sterilization or 'cutting off the bad stock' of the 'unfit'. The most famous of the Nazis present at this meeting was Dr Ernst Rudin, a psychiatrist at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Genealogy and Demography in Berlin. The Rockefeller family paid for Dr Rudin to occupy an entire floor with his Eugenics 'research'. Ernst Rudin was unanimously elected president of the 'International Federation of Eugenics Societies' at this congress. Dr Rudin, the founder of the German Society for Race Hygiene, was now official leader of the world eugenics movement.
The British-American European groups had openly called for elimination of the 'unfit' by all means including force and violence even before the Auschwitz death camps became known. In July 1933, Dr Rudin wrote the 'Law for the Prevention of Hereditary Diseases in Posterity', the sterilization law based on earlier US statutes in Virginia and other states. Special courts were soon set up for the sterilization of German mental patients, the blind, the deaf and alcoholics. A quarter million people in these categories were sterilized. Dr. Rudin, Plotz and their colleagues trained a whole generation of physicians and psychiatrists as sterilizers and killers! When WWII started, the eugenicists, doctors and psychiatrists staffed the new' T4' agency, which planned and supervised the mass killings; first at 'euthanasia centers', where previously these categories were sterilized, they were now murdered and their brains sent in lots of 200 to experimental psychiatrists; then at slave camps such as Auschwitz; and finally, for Jews and other race groups, at straight extermination camps in Poland such as Treblinka and Belsen.
John D Rockefeller Jr appointed William S. Farish as chairman of Standard Oil co. in 1933. As the new chairman, Farish moved his offices to Rockefeller Center, New York. Here he interacted often with Hermann Schmitz, chairman of I.G. Farben. A publicity man, Ivy Lee, was instructed by them to write pro-IG.Farben and pro-Nazi propaganda for US consumption. I. G. Farben was the German chemical giant that had great financial links with Standard Oil and was the support base for Nazi Germany.
Now Dr Rudin was paid directly by the SS. This account was handled by Emil Helfferich and Karl Lindemann through the Schroder Bank of Cologne who were authorized to write checks to Heinrich Himmler, chief of the Nazi S.S., on a special Standard Oil account. Schroeder Bank was a conduit for funding Hitler's rise to power which was managed by the German-British-American banker, Kurt von Schroeder. According to U.S. intelligence documents reviewed by author Anthony Sutton, Emil Helfferich continued his payments to the S.S. into 1944 while the S.S. was supervising the mass murder at the Standard-I.G. Farben Auschwitz and other death camps. Helferrich told Allied interrogators after the war that these were not his personal contributions, rather they were corporate Standard Oil funds, which off course was denied by the controlling owner of Standard Oil (Rockefeller family) when questioned by the Roosevelt administration. Yet Dr Rudin was given an entire floor to occupy at New York for his Eugenics Project in 1932 by the same owners of Standard Oil. (Taken from 'George Bush-The Unauthorized Biography' pg 50 by W.G. Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin and published by Executive Intelligence Review-Washington D.C.)