TRUTH
ALWAYS
WINS

HEALTH ISSUES

A VACCINE FORM YOU CAN GIVE

to Your Pediatrician

 

Want assurances from your pediatrician about vaccines?  Here’s a form designed by Ken Anderson you can give them to fill out -- although there is no physician anywhere on earth who will sign it.

PLEASE NOTE: In addition to the form below, there is a web site  VacLib.Org that has compiled information on Vaccine Exemption Forms and Information

Here are Links to Their Information

 

[AK] [AL] [AR] [AZ] [Australia] [Canada] [CA] [CO] [CT] [DC] [DE] [FL] [GA] [GUAM] [HI] [IA] [ID] [IL] [IN] [KS] [KY] [LA] [Maine] [MD] [Mass] [MI] [MN] [MO] [MS] [MT] [NC] [ND] [NE] [NH] [NJ] [NM] [NV] [NY] [New Zealand] [OH] [OK] [OR] [PA] [PUERTO_RICO] [RI] [SC] [SD] [TN] [TX] [UT] [VA] [VT] [WA] [WI] [WV] [WY]

 

Physician"s Warranty of Vaccine Safety

I (Physician"s name, degree)_________________________, _____ am a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State of ________________. My State license number is _______________ , and my DEA number is _______________. My medical specialty is ________________________

I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all the medications that I prescribe for or administer to my patients.  In the case of (Patient"s name) ___________________________ , age _________ , whom I have examined, I find that certain risk factors exist that justify the recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk factors and the vaccinations that will protect against them:

Risk Factor ____________________________________________

Vaccination  ___________________________________________

Risk Factor ____________________________________________

Vaccination  ___________________________________________

Risk Factor ____________________________________________

Vaccination  ___________________________________________

Risk Factor ____________________________________________

Vaccination  ___________________________________________

Risk Factor ____________________________________________

Vaccination  ___________________________________________

Risk Factor ____________________________________________

Vaccination  ___________________________________________

 

I am aware that vaccines typically contain many of the following fillers:

*         aluminum hydroxide

*         aluminum phosphate

*         ammonium sulfate

*         amphotericin B

*         animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain,

*         dog kidney, monkey kidney,

*         chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg

*         calf (bovine) serum

*         betapropiolactone

*         fetal bovine serum

*         formaldehyde

*         formalin

*         gelatin

*         glycerol

*         human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)

*         hydrolized gelatin

*         mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r))

*         monosodium glutamate (MSG)

*         neomycin

*         neomycin sulfate

*         phenol red indicator

*         phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)

*         potassium diphosphate

*         potassium monophosphate

*         polymyxin B

*         polysorbate 20

*         polysorbate 80

*         porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein

*         residual MRC5 proteins

*         sorbitol

*         tri(n)butylphosphate,

*         VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and

*         washed sheep red blood

and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient.  I have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosol causes severe neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.

I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin"s lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals. I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no substantive risk to my patient.)

I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient"s name) _______________ _______________________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies (also known as "fetuses").

In order to protect my patient"s well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.

STEPS TAKEN: ______________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

 

I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.

The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A , attached hereto, -- "Physician"s Bases for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety." (Please itemize each recommended vaccine separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)

The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician"s Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B , attached hereto, -- "Scientific Articles in Support of Physician"s Warranty of Vaccine Safety."

The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my opinion are itemized on Exhibit C , attached hereto, -- "Scientific Articles Contrary to Physician"s Opinion of Vaccine Safety."

The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in Attachment D , attached hereto, -- "Physician"s Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of Adverse Scientific Opinions."

Hepatitis B

I understand that 60 percent of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years. I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group. I understand that in the VAERS, there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 year age group, with 47 deaths reported.

I understand that 50 percent of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after exposure. I understand that 30 percent will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have lifetime immunity. I understand that 20 percent will develop the symptoms of the disease, but that 95 percent will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.

I understand that 5 percent of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become chronic carriers of the disease. I understand that 75 percent of the chronic carriers will live with an asymptomatic infection and that only 25 percent of the chronic carriers will develop chronic liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection.

The following scientific studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children under the age of 5 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________

In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D , attached hereto, "Non-vaccine Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors."

I am issuing this Physician"s Warranty of Vaccine Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient"s name) ________________________________.

Regardless of the legal entity under which I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case.

I issue this document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is _____________________________, an attorney admitted to the Bar in the State of __________________ .

 

__________________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)

__________________________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)

Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. ________

Witness: _______________________________  Date: ______________________

Notary Public: ___________________________  Date: ______________________

 

 

 

Dr. Mercola's Comments:

 

Although you likely won’t find any physician anywhere willing to sign this form, it could be a valuable learning lesson to simply bring it with you and present it to him or her, if nothing else just to observe the reaction.

Because the truth is, your pediatrician is not taking responsibility for any adverse reactions or damage that happens to your child, and neither are the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture the vaccines that injure countless children each year.

Vaccine companies have long ago used political manipulation through their strong lobbying efforts to created legislation that essentially immunizes them against any law suit damages or awards. The Homeland Security bill also contains a provision that protects manufacturers of vaccines that contain thimerosal from liability in vaccine-related lawsuits. Pro-vaccine-safety educators have long been saying that vaccines can over-stimulate your child’s immune system, sometimes causing the very disease it’s designed to protect against, or worse. And, when several vaccines are administered together, or in close succession, their interaction may completely overwhelm your child’s developing immune system.

 

Once that happens, what can you do? Where can you turn?

 

You’re far better off doing your own research beforehand so that you can make an educated decision about the health of your child, than to blindly trust your pediatrician, who likely has not done much research on it either, and is in turn trusting the information they get directly from the vaccine manufacturer.

 

There’s Little Help to Be Had Once Tragedy Strikes

 

President Reagan signed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 into law on Nov. 14, 1986, which is the legislation I mentioned above. However, in the two decades since, it has become obvious that the vaccine injury compensation program is fatally flawed, and so broken it should be repealed – something Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is strongly advocating.

The NVIC is also currently petitioning the Obama Administration and Congress to investigate the fast track licensure and universal use recommendation of Gardasil; the HPV vaccine that has already caused over 10,000 adverse event reports to be filed since its release in 2006.

During the program’s 22-year history, two out of three individuals applying for federal vaccine injury compensation have been turned away empty-handed.

As of October 2008, of a total of 12,746 claims that had been filed, 2,266 had been compensated to the tune of about $1.8 billion, while 4,755 had been dismissed.

And although the claims were supposed to be handled "quickly, easily and with certainty and generosity," according to a House report accompanying the 1986 legislation, many claims have taken years -- more than 10 years -- to be settled.

Even the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration state that it takes an average of two to three years to adjudicate a claim after it is filed.


How Does the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Work?

 

Prior to October 1, 1988, you could pursue an unrestricted lawsuit against a vaccine manufacturer if you, or your child were injured by a vaccine. After that date, including currently, you are required to apply for federal compensation prior to pursuing a lawsuit.

According to the program’s guidelines:

  • The system will offer to pay up to $250,000 for a vaccine-associated death.
  • The system will offer to pay for all past and future unreimbursed medical expenses, custodial and nursing home care; up to $250,000 pain and suffering; and loss of earned income.


These remedies surely fall far short of what is deserved and required if your child is injured, or killed, by a vaccine. You simply cannot put a price on a lost life, and a study by Harvard professor Michael Ganz found that the lifetime cost of caring for a child with autism is more than $3 million.

And yet, according to statistics from the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, not one case related to autism has been deemed “compensable.” Only last year did the government concede that vaccines “significantly aggravated” an underlying disorder and caused “autistic symptoms” in one 9-year-old girl named Hannah Poling.

So who is actually responsible for paying whatever meager compensations that do get awarded?

Contrary to what you would think, it is NOT the vaccine manufacturers.

The system is funded by a surcharge on each dose of vaccine sold. The doctors pay the tax initially when they purchase the vaccines, but this is passed right down to the parents of the child.

So not only are the vaccine manufacturers shielded from potential lawsuits, they are not even responsible for paying one cent of the claims filed against them -- you are!


What Options do You Have?


The government essentially forces children to get vaccines by threatening to not let them into the school system otherwise. Well, a growing network of parents have decided to
homeschool their children, in part because of their belief that mandated vaccinations for public and private school children are a dangerous overreach by state governments.

The trend toward not vaccinating has been growing for some time now. Close to 70 percent of physicians say that the number of concerns from parents have increased significantly in recent years.


And rightfully so.


If you read the form above, you saw a long list of potentially toxic chemicals – fillers and adjuvants -- that are included in various vaccines given to newborns and children.

If your child is vaccinated according to the CDC's recommended schedule, by the time your child starts kindergarten he or she will have received 48 doses of 14 vaccines.  Of these, 36 doses will be given during the first 18 months of life.

Public health officials have NEVER proven that it is indeed safe to inject this number and volume of vaccines into infants. What's more, they cannot explain why, concurrent with an increasing number of vaccinations, there has been an explosion of neurological and immune system disorders in American children.


As I’ve stated before, I’m not anti-vaccine, but rather pro-vaccine safety, and homeschooling your children is not the only option out there.

In the Related Links below, I have included the link to Dr. Donald Miller’s recommendations for a more sensible vaccination schedule.

If you have reviewed the evidence and still feel your child should be inoculated to a certain degree, this is a far safer alternative to the standard program. Your pediatrician will not like this schedule, but he or she will probably be more apt to go along with a modified schedule than signing the form above.

I’d also recommend you print out this NVIC flyer detailing how to recognize a vaccine reaction, and review it after each and every vaccination.

If you decide you do not want to vaccinate, know that all 50 states have vaccination requirements but all states provide exemptions for medical reasons while 48 states allow exemptions for sincerely held religious beliefs. Another 18 states allow parents to opt out for personal, conscientious or philosophical beliefs as well.

My previous article,
How To Legally Avoid Unwanted Immunizations Of All Kinds, spells out how you go about practicing this right, as does an entire chapter in my book Take Control of Your Health.

 

Support Those Who Champion Vaccine Safety

 

My team has recently created a brand new web site for the NVIC, which I urge you to visit for more information on all topics related to vaccines and vaccine safety.

And, if you believe strongly in NVIC's effort to inform the  public about these types of issues, you can support their cause by making a donation of $25 or more to NVIC and receive a gift of Barbara's 2008 book Vaccines, Autism & Chronic Inflammation: The New Epidemic. Please click HERE to make a donation.

 


 

Vaccinations Designed to STERILIZE WOMAN?

by Kjeld Heising (Rense.com) 11-9-7

 

Women are being drawn into a medical trap.The outcome is toxication and health erosion. The tool is vaccinations ­ presented as a solution to "fight" an ever growing number of dangers from the world of microbes. The medical world has got its own Al Qaeda ­ the invisible army of viruses. With exactly the same attributes: Unknown, being everywhere and nowhere. Invincible.

The answer is also approximately the same: More fear, more death. And now, with growing clarity, targeting women. We have for more than a decade had the campaigns for mandatory HIV-tests of pregnant women. Only women. In the Third World, we have had numerous vaccination campaigns targeting women in their fertile age. Only women. Recently, in Denmark, the great drug donor, Bill Gates, has donated USD 10m to a Copenhagen university to further studies on a Malaria vaccine ­ target group: Women of the Third World.

And then, the latest stunt: Vaccination of 12 year old girls in many countries ­ allegedly against the HPV virus which might (or might not) eventually cause Cervical Cancer. Target group: Girls in the age of just becoming fertile. In some states mandatory, in others just heavily propagandized.

What is all this about? Money? Of course but that doesn't account for the focusing on women. Special care for women? Nice. But in fatal opposition to the agenda of "women's lib". Women's lib doesn't include reproduction and is uninterested in the female sex.

Could it be ?

Yes, it could be exactly the opposite, and I'll tell you why.

First, "women's lib" is not a population movement fostered by women being sick-and-tired of oppression. It it a masculine invention, defined in policy papers back from the 1950's, most eagerly promoted by the Rockefeller all-

seeing-everywhere-being dynasty and it's political operators. Approximately at the same time when the first feminists surfaced, and already up and run as the project culminated. That happened with the 1974 Henry Kissinger <i>National Security Study Memorandum 200</i> about "the consequences of the global population growth for the US security and overseas interests".

 

This paper, which should be given much much more attention , states that Urgent immediate measures must be taken to reduce fertility. The memo recommends Zero growth rate in the developed countries by 1985 and Zero growth rate in Lesser Developed Countries by 2000. Notice: Defertilization first in the West, then down to the poor.

It also recommends the tools. For the industrialized world:

Reproductive health - a nicer word for abortion, use of condoms etc. Sex education Improved health Women' equality Day care Government participation Improved social security Reduced infant mortality

Well, in Europe, we used to call this "welfare". It now seems, it was just a means to make us stop reproducing ourselves. A great success: Today, we find declining birth rates all over the Western World ­ only Albania (the poorest country of Europe ­ no "welfare") is maintaining the size of of its population.

The picture becomes clearer when we learn that our Rockefeller-friend John D. the Third back in the 1950's also began advocating that all vaccines should have added Mercury. That served a tripple purpose: Mercury works as a preservative. It can help the chemical industry get rid of a highly toxic waste product (just like Fluoride in toothpaste did). And, most important, the Mercury is absorbed in our body, is not automatically excreted and has various toxic effects.

One of the effects is that it destroys the cilia inside the female sex, removing the ability of the mucous membrane to transport men's semen to the egg cells. Which obviously impedes natural conception. Another effect is that children who are born become autistic - the frequency of autistic children increases clearly with the amount of Mercury consumed. And there are other effects of this additive which is called <i>thiomesal</i> - such as diabetes.

So, any vaccine containing Mercury, is a defertilization drug. That means almost all vaccines almost all over the world.

We get another clue by studying simple facts on HIV and AIDS. As shown in many papers and documentaries, the existence of a virus destroying our immune system has never been documented ­ to this day it remains a rumour having obsessed most of the medical world and, by being backed up by deeply corrupt statal medical authorities, a fully controlled political layer and a centralized media network loving the "scary setup", it has also obsessed most common people.

The facts are that as well as there is no disease-causing HIV virus, there is no test which can prove it's presence in human blood. The so-called HIV-tests test the presence of antibodies and antibodies belong in a functioning immune system. The tests are known to crossreact with many conditions having nothing to do with any particular virus. One of these conditions is you better sit down pregnancy.

That's where the AIDS swindle becomes a depopulation tool. For the next step from a positive HIV test is prescription of deadly toxic drugs (charmingly named "Life Prolonging Medication") destroying the immune system and the intestine's ability to absorb nutrients - and causing defective children. These drugs are the most toxic chemicals ever invented by the pharmaceutical industry.

In Africa, HIV tests are only performed on pregnancy clinics. And guess where the deadly drugs go.

Another clue becomes clear when we look at the WHO vaccination campaigns in the Third World. Most famous are the campaigns from the mid nineties against Tetanus. Despite the fact that 70% of all Tetanus occurred in men, the vaccinations were only given to women. And only women between 14 and 44 years old. The vaccines were mixed with hCG Gonadotropine. Now, hCG is a hormone which is naturally formed in the foetus within the first few days, and which is necessary for it's continued life and growth. When the mixture of vaccine and hCG is inoculated in a woman's blood, her immune defence will not only produce antibodies to the Tetanus bacteria but also to the hCG. As a result, she looses her foetus.

These vaccination campaigns were performed on millions and millions of women in Nicaragua, Mexico, Nigeria, Tanzania and the Philippines.

Other vaccination campaigns have had other effects. In Uganda, a polio vaccination was performed, killing 600 children in just one month and just

one village (Mbarara) - in which there was by coincidence a counting. In Nigeria, polio vaccine was distributed, contaminated with estradiol and a number of carcinogen (cancer generating) agents. How many more of these criminal campaigns have been performed through the years?

Then we have the bogus on the Malaria vaccine. Malaria is no microbe disease, so what has a vaccine to do with this? Nothing. But the funny scientist came up with a funny story on a "certain molecule" being necessary for the Malaria parasite to fix on the inside of women's uterus. It's the molecule the vaccine is supposed to target. But only in women.

The average age of women getting Cervical Cancer is 50 ­ as Dr. Tim O'Shea writes in his excellent article "HPV - The First Cancer Vaccine" on Rense.com (http://www.rense.com/general78/hpv.htm). The creator of the HPV vaccine, company Merck, promises an effect-time of five years. So, what the point of vaccinating 12 years old girls?

I have no doubt anymore: This has nothing to do with medicine. It has nothing to do with anything based on science. It has nothing to do with diseases. It is a money machine, yes, but it is more. We have another war, and this war is moving from covert to overt. We have a global war on women. -------

Heising is a Danish Men's activist. He can be reached at kjeld@heising.dk

 

THE VACCINE DEBATE

 

While being interviewed on some political issues on a local radio program, I made comments concerning the harms of vaccinations. A doctor called in on air to refute my statements. He subsequently got hold of my number from the radio station, called me and lectured me for more than half an hour, saying that I should stick to religion and theology and not deal with issues that I have no knowledge of. I gave him a patient hearing and accepted his advice as he was a qualified medical specialist. When I was not given an opportunity to respectfully respond, I calmly requested that we continue our discussion by email, to which he agreed.

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Sxxxxxxx Hxxxx> wrote:

 

W/salaam

Maulana, many of the articles you quote are nothing but disguised

commercials promoting the sale of Vit D, probiotics, etc, and making

statements about the value of these products that have not been

validated scientifically or medically, and you have fallen for them

hook, line and sinker. One really needs to be living in the dark ages

to believe statements such as  ''flu vaccines have never been shown to

work, and are poisonous....'' etc,

 

I attach a document that was prepared a few years by me and other

specialists on behalf of the IMA when Ml Desai (Majlis) started his

campaign on the basis of half-baked research. This current version has

been updated recently.

Also  attached for interest is  2 page comment (vaccination

controversy ) I was asked to compile for a magazine.

 

This document was compiled at the request of the Jamiat as well,

because they felt the public needed the proper perspective. At the

time that we compiled this information brochure, we (the group of

'sincere but misled' specialists') were fully aware of the views and

opinions that you subscribe to, and the 'conspiracy' theories around

vaccination - so the articles and literature quoted by you and the

arguments cited are nothing new, they are as old as the hills.

There have been many scientific studies commissioned at governement

level (especially in the UK), to clear up the confusion in the minds

of the public.

These studies have largely debunked the myths propagated by the loony

anti-vaccination brigade.

 

However, they will never be convinced, and neither will you, judging

from my experience and interaction with others who hold similar views,

including the Majlis. By the way, the Majlis holds exactly the same

views as you do, and quotes almost exactly the same or similar

literature as you do. According to the Majlis, every medically

qualified Muslim proffessional who opposes this view is brainwashed,

and is allied to the kuffaar medical establishment.  In other words,

we are too dumb and stupid to see through the dark plots of

conspiracy, which the light of his Imaan has made possible for him to

see.

 

I reietrate what I said to you: you are ignoring the advice and

guidance of people around and near you, whose qualifications and

credentials you can verify, who are qualified technically,

scientifically, and medically to express an opinion and guidance on

these issues, and instead you are giving preference to the opinion of

people who claim to be experts, who you do not even know, whose

theories you do not have the scientific and biologic background to

critically appraise, and whose credentials you cannot even verify.

Does this make sense, even from a Shariah point of view?  Does a

qualified mufti who is sincere not get rewarded even if he gives the

wrong fatwa, as opposed to an unqualified person who will be held

accountable even if he issues a correct fatwa?

 

If, as you say all of modern allopathic medicine is a conspiracy that

has been hatched ( ?by the Rochilds and Rockefellers,?zionists,

?freemasons), and is actually harmful to mankind, and most of medicine

and the medical profession is currently being manipulated by the

pharmaceutical industry etc than I would suggest the following:

 

1. stop administering all antibiotics, even in life-threatening cases

such as meningitis and TB, where antibiotics have been proven to be

life-saving, and rather administer herbal medication etc. After all,

many antibiotics are still produced by germs, and are therefore

'impure'

 

2. stop administering all other allopathic medicines as well,

especially the injectable ones - after all, injections contain all

those poisonous preservatives and ingredients that are contained in

vaccines

 

3.stop the use of modern diagnostic facilities such as X-rays etc,

because these are after all the products of research from medical and

other institutions that have been funded by the Rotchilds etc. In

other words, if your child sustains a serious injury with fractures

etc, do not perform X-rays to diagnose. There should be no operation

performed even if the bones are badly broken and require surgery,

because modern anaesthesia and techniques are the products of a

conspiracy. Rather apply herbal and traditionla remedies - not even a

plaster of paris for obvious  fractures - rather apply Bor from the

traditional hakims.

 

The list goes on and on, and we end up sounding quite civilised,

progressive and intelligent, dont we?

 

Maulana, as for being open-minded about conspiracies, see how

open-minded you can be about the following theory that I encountered

while I was working in Saudi Arabia, from a fellow South African -

this was during the mont of Ramadhan, when I encouraged him to join me and others who were reading 20 rakaats taraweeh, instead of being lazy and just reading 8, like most people in the city of Riyadh.

He requested that I be open-minded about the views of the local Ulema

and imams - he insisted that I read certain books that condemn the

following of madhabs etc -

I said I am busy, with work and family, and I dont have the time and

energy to explore all the different views on the matter - in any case,

it is not necessary, because we come from South Africa, we will be

going back there, it is quite sufficent for us to follow the views of

our Ulema in South Africa, whom we know, their background, their

institutions, etc - why follow someone u dont know, whose ideologies

are foreign to what you have been taught by trustworthy people.

To which he replied: actually, most of our Ulema are products of

Deoband - unknown to them, Deoband was the creation of the British and other evil forces - it was a whole conspiracy to create division and

destroy the Ummah. I said what about all the intelligent, learned and

pious people who studied there over the ages - were they so stupid and

dumb that they could not see what you have seen - or are they also

part of the plot, intentionally misleading us? He said no, our

Deobando Ulema are mostly sincere but misled, they need to be educated

about the conspiracy that they have been victims to, and they will

need to unlearn a lot of what they have learnt. He offered to show me

convincing evidence for this elaborate conspiracy, if I was prepared

to have an open mind. I preferred to have a closed  mind and not waste

my time listening to or studying his rubbish evidence.

 

Does this ring a bell with the theories you are putting forward

regarding the elaborate conspiracy of the Rocthilds etc, fooling many

generations of doctors and scientists in the whole world?  Are you

prepared to be open-minded about the Deoband theories? These people

are convinced about the British conspiracies, and they will never

budge, no matter what counter evidence is presented to them. Just like

the Majlis, who will never listen no matter what sound and authentic

evidence is presented to him - and the anti-vaccination lobby, who are

fanatical in their weird beliefs. I fear you might be treading down

the same path.

 

This is the problem with almost all conspiracy theories: they are the

product of people with lunatic or psychopathic tendencies, with very

fertile imaginations, and they have the art of building up a support

base and commanding a substantial following by means of deception and

misrepresenting scientific facts - there is a sucker born every minute

to believe them. I have been down the road of being obsessed with

conspiracy theories for many years as a University student, reading

countless books on the subject, being dragged into the intricate web

spun by these sick minds, and debating the subject for many hours till

late into the night. In retrospect, my time would have been better

spent concentrating on my studies, making zikrullah, and reading the

Quran. The conspiracy theories are themselves a conspiracy of shaytaan

: designed to preoccupy people with imaginary happenings, and to

demoralise and make people despondent when they start to believe that

all aspects of their lives are controlled by dark and sinister forces

- they also serve to attribute to the conspirators powers far beyond

what they possess, almost like the Allmighty, who controls everything.

 

Finally, my advice to you is the same that I gave to my friend in

Riyadh : dont complicate things for yourself and others by going the

down dark alleys of suspicion and conspiracy, and reading too much

into everything - there is no end to all theories and assumptions.

Confine yourself to matters that you are qualified and have sound

knowlege to deal with, and leave the rest to the experts (the true

ones!). Dont argue unnecessarily in matters that are beyond the scope

of your training and vocation.

 

If we all follow this advice (including myself), I think there will be

less chances of causing unnecessary harm to others and to ourselves.

Jazakallah

Dr Sxxxxxxx Kxxxxx

 

On 10/21/09, Rafiek Ismail < supporttruth@gmail.com> wrote:

 

As-Salaamu-alaikum

Dearest Doctor Saheb

 

Allah declares : "And say: Truth has arrived and falsehood has perished; for falsehood, by it's very nature is bound to perish."(Quran)

Nabee(s.a.w.) taught us a brilliant dua which is quite relevant in the present era of deception: "O Allah, show us the Truth as the Truth and grant us (the ability) to follow it, and show us the falsehood as falsehood and grant us(the ability) to abstain from it."

 

I have noted your sarcastic remarks and your simple dismissal of the Alternate arguments as a mere agenda for commercialization. My experience with many family members and friends who are medical doctors is that they simply cannot Handle the Truth. While many educated people in the West have long abandoned Allopathic(chemical-based drugs) treatment for Chronic illnesses, we in the colonised third world countries hang onto this system as though it is revelation from the heavens. Yes, no doubt modern medicine has made great strides in science and technology to be able to deal with traumas, emergencies, accident injuries and wounds. Alas, in the area of disease and illnesses it has proven to be a dismal failure. The entire approach and premise on which the allopathic system operates is seriously flawed, since the focus is on microbes and germs as the primary problem. Yet, just as a home that is kept spotless and clean will not attract rats and cockroaches, so will a healthy body in most instances resist being overcome by viruses and bacteria. In other words the body is kept more alkaline than acidic, since the body is better able to resist infections when it is not acidic, and also the immune system is maintained with a healthy diet free from toxin build up and pollution. What we have in the system of Allopathy is disease management, since doctors are trained mostly with drug-based therapies. All we hear from these "Disease Managers" is that "there is no cure for this or that illness", the patient will just have to live on medication.(be a drugie).So drugs are prescribes for the rest of the patient's life to suppress the symptoms(which are in fact messages from the body that correction in lifestyle and diet is required in order to heal). The root cause of the illness is never addressed because Doctors are not educated sufficiently in Nutrition neither are they familiar with Bio-Energy healing techniques which assist the marvelous body created by the Brilliant Creator to heal itself.  This, as a Muslim, cannot be accepted because it directly contradicts the teachings of Rasulullah(s.a.w.):

 

Abu Huraira (r.a.) reports from Rasulullah(s.a.w.) that He said: "Allah did not send down any disease, except He sent for it a cure "(Bukhari)

Jabir bin Abdullah(r.a.) reports that Rasulullah(s.a.w.) said: "For every disease is a cure; so if the cure of the disease is found, healing(cure) will be achieved by Allah's permission."(Muslim)

Usama bin Shareek(r.a.) reports from Rasullulah(s.a.w.) that he said: "Certainly Allah did not send down any disease except He sent down for it a cure; he who knows it, knows it and he is ignorant of it who is ignorant of it." (Musnad Ahmad)

 

When you are ready to handle the Truth and open your (self-confessed closed) mind, we will share with you the many alternate healing systems that are remarkably effective because these systems approach the human body holistically as the Bodymind complex. Each person is regarded as unique and not from the flawed standpoint that "one size fits all". Respect for the human body as a marvellous creation which has it's own intelligence and ability to heal itself does not allow for removing human organs and parts and replacing with another like a motor vehicle. " Most certainly We have honoured the children of Adam". It would shock you to hear professionals from your own fraternity moving to alternate Healing Systems because they found results with it which they definitely could not get with allopathic drugs and surgery. The Bio-energy Healing Arts are rapidly being recognised as State of the Art healing sciences and which is making Allopathy Medicine look truly ARCHAIC. This because the Oil industry and Bankers have got their teeth and claws into the Pharmaceutical Giants which in turn fund the Medical Colleges so that they promote drug based therapies and surgery. Go into any Pharmacy today and see how many are forced to carry a range of herbal and nutritional products, because people are becoming wiser and taking charge of their own health. They are tired of having others managing their disease, they want TRUE healing. Do your homework dear Doctor on the 3rd leading cause of Death according to JAMA in the US and UK. It's not much different for our countries over here. I am talking of Iatrogenics.  Yes you may call all this as conspiracy theories, but take the Real pain, spend real money to get this information and do your research with an open mind. You will InshAllah discover that everything is not a conspiracy, but every conspiracy is not a theory either.

 

Just last night I discovered another book(abt 312 pages) called Rockefeller Medicine Men- Medicine and Capitalism in America by E. Richard Brown published by University of California Press(dr-rath-foundation.org). Another among many authors that expose the deep rot in Allopathic medicine because it serves the interests of the Oil and Banking Captains. Please wake up to these realities. Dr Gary Null has also written the book "The Collapse of Conventional Medicine". So, when you are truly ready to Handle the Truth, I will share with you the little that I know so that you may truly help man to recover his health. There are many other books that I could refer you to, not written by QUACKS, rest assured about that. They are causing a true revolution in your field.

 

Sorry, time has run out for me and I have not yet got to the topic of Vaccines. But do yourself a big favour Doc, visit the websites of two among many Vaccine Experts:

 

1) www.drcarley.com. Her child was taken from her when she refused to allow any further vaccinations. She fought the case in court and was recognised by the Court as a Vaccine Expert. Her website offers a $10 000 reward to any medical professional that can prove her research wrong. To this day it has not yet been claimed.

2)www.sayingnotovaccines.com or www.drtenpenny.com. Also you will be amazed at the volume of info on this site www.vaclib.org and www.thinktwice.com. You don't need any fancy degrees to understand that they have a lot to say against Vaccines, just simple English will do.

 

Yours in the service of Islam

Ml Rafiek Mohamed

(Alternate News Network-Researching the Truth, Exposing the Lies)

 

Dear Readers and Researchers: Please review some of the many websites by the medical fraternity that strongly oppose vaccines. Vaccinations also, I believe, contradict the idea that our Creator created us with a perfect immune system. I have made a list of some websites for useful information on vaccines which I only recently discovered although I had already gathered my own research years ago that indicates vaccines more harmful than beneficial. I hope this will be of benefit in changing your view.

 

1)http://vaccines.mercola.com/

2)http://drtenpenny.com/default.aspx

3)http://www.sayingnotovaccines.com/

4)http://www.vaclib.org/

5)http://www.vaccinerights.com/

6)http://www.vactruth.com/

7)http://www.goodnewsaboutgod.com/studies/birdflu.htm

8)http://www.thinktwice.com/

9)http://vacbook.com/miv.htm

10)http://www.drcarley.com/

11) http://www.drlenhorowitz.com

12)http://www.tetrahedron.org

13)http://www.credence.org

 

 Your comments after researching these sites will be welcome. We owe ourselves and the Ummah the Truth.

Salaams

Your Brother in Islam

Rafiek Mohamed

www.truthalwayswins.org / www.alternatenewsnetwork.com

email: supporttruth@gmail.com

 

                        'Cull' The Surplus Population

 

Prince Philip, In His Own Words: We Need To 'Cull' The Surplus Population
The New Federalist and The American Almanac
 
His Royal Virus

* Reported by Deutsche Press Agentur (DPA), August, 1988.

In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.

* Prince Philip, in his Foreward to If I Were an Animal; United Kingdom, Robin Clark Ltd., 1986.

I just wonder what it would be like to be reincarnated in an animal whose species had been so reduced in numbers than it was in danger of extinction. What would be its feelings toward the human species whose population explosion had denied it somewhere to exist.... I must confess that I am tempted to ask for reincarnation as a particularly deadly virus.

* Press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. on the occasion of the ``Caring for Creation'' conference of the North American Conference on Religion and Ecology, May 18, 1990.

It is now apparent that the ecological pragmatism of the so-called pagan religions, such as that of the American Indians, the Polynesians, and the Australian Aborigines, was a great deal more realistic in terms of conservation ethics than the more intellectual monotheistic philosophies of the revealed religions.

* Address on Receiving Honorary Degree from the University of Western Ontario, Canada, July 1, 1983.

For example, the World Health Organization Project, designed to eradicate malaria from Sri Lanka in the postwar years, achieved its purpose. But the problem today is that Sri Lanka must feed three times as many mouths, find three times as many jobs, provide three times the housing, energy, schools, hospitals and land for settlement in order to maintain the same standards. Little wonder the natural environment and wildlife in Sri Lanka has suffered. The fact [is] ... that the best-intentioned aid programs are at least partially responsible for the problems.

* Preface to Down to Earth by HRH Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, 1988, p.|8.

I don't claim to have any special interest in natural history, but as a boy I was made aware of the annual fluctuations in the number of game animals and the need to adjust the ``cull'' to the size of the surplus population.

* Lecture to the European Council of International Schools. Montreaux, Switzerland, Nov. 14, 1986.

The great difficulty about ``life'' is that we humans are part of it, and it is therefore almost impossible to study objectively.... It therefore tends to be anthropocentric and gives scant attention to the welfare of all the other life-forms which share this planet with us.

...|When the Bible says that man shall have ``dominion'' over God's creation, the choice is between understanding dominion as in ``having power over,'' or dominion as ``having responsibility for.''

Don't Interfere with the Balance of Nature

Once you have interfered with the balance of nature it becomes necessary to maintain the balance by artificial means. This means that some animals have to be killed in the interest of maintaining the health and viability of the species as a whole as well as the benefit of other more vulnerable species. Unfortunately there are many people who object to that sort of thing.

Ecology is not concerned with the fate of individual animals. It accepts the concept of the exploitation of surplus natural resources because that is in the way the natural system works, but it must always be done on the principle of maintaining a sustainable yield.... The inexorable rule of nature is that if you mess up your environment you will have to pay a heavy price sooner or later.... Just look around the globe today and you cannot fail to notice areas which at one time supported highly successful and civilized populations are either deserts or they have reverted to jungle. The reason is quite simple: they over-exploited their natural resources and they paid the price. It is naive to think that we can escape the same fate for very much longer. We are only managing to put off the evil hour by frantically digging up and using mineral resources that can never be renewed. As if that were not enough, we are polluting the atmosphere, the land and the waters with every kind of noxious substance. The ``greenhouse effect'' alone could well have devastating consequences for all life on earth.

This is a reflection of the duality of man's brain. The left brain produces the reasonable answers after objective scientific research, while the right brain prefers the acceptable and the emotionally satisfactory answers. How often do people say, ``That may be so, but I prefer to `believe' or I like to believe ... this, that or the other''?

The duality of the brain has created great problems for modern man.... It is ... significant that successful engineering makes money. This is in stark contrast to the supernatural, whether it is religious or mythological. In the latter cases the truth may be equally certain, but it is not verifiable, and the outcome of following rules is seldom predictable. It is, of course, possible to exploit magic and mythology commercially, but it could hardly be described as a manufacturing industry....

There is an understandable public pressure for schools and colleges to concentrate on utilitarian subjects to the exclusion of cultural and aesthetic development. In other words, the development of the left brain is given a great deal more attention than that of the right brain.... The trouble is that neglect of the development of the right brain leaves it in a state of vacuum.... This means that the right brain is ready to absorb the first plausible ideas it happens across. The occult, obscure religious rites, parapsychology, astrology and similar attractive but irrational notions are sucked into the vacant space without any discrimination or critical faculty.... I also suspect that the use of drugs might be seen as a substitute, or short cut, to filling the vacuum of the right brain....

I mention all this because man's attitude to nature is partly a function of the left brain and partly a function of the right brain. It is easy enough to encourage an emotional concern for nature and the living world.... Everyone can comprehend the idea of cruelty, very few can comprehend the extinction of a species.

"Conflict Between Instinct and Reason"

* Fawley Foundation Lecture. Southampton University, Nov. 24, 1967.

The conflict between instinct and reason has reached a critical stage in man's affairs, largely because the explosion of facts has revealed the instincts for what they are and at the same time it has undermined traditional philosophies and ideologies. The explosion of facts has effectively altered mankind's physical and intellectual environment and when any environment changes, the process of natural selection is brutal and merciless. ``Adapt or die'' is as true today as it was in the beginning.

* Introduction to ``Exploitation of the Natural System'' section of Down to Earth by HRH Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, 1988.

It took about three and a half billion years for life on earth to reach the state of complexity and diversity that our ancestors knew as recently as 200 years ago. It has only taken industrial and scientific man those 200 years to put at risk the whole of the world's natural system. It has been estimated that by the year 2000, some 300,000 species of plants and animals will have become extinct, and that the natural economy, upon which all life depends, will have been seriously disrupted.

The paradox is that this will have been achieved with the best possible intentions. The human population must be properly fed, human life must be preserved and human existence must be made safer and more comfortable. All these things are obviously highly desirable, but if their achievement means putting the survival of future generations at risk, then there is a pressing obligation on present generations to apply some measure of self-restraint.

* Address to Edinburgh University Union, Nov. 24 1969.

We talk about over- and underdeveloped countries; I think a more exact division might be between underdeveloped and overpopulated. The more people there are, the more industry and more waste and the more sewage there is, and therefore the more pollution.

* The Fairfield Osborne Lecture, New York, Oct. 1 1980.

If the world pollution situation is not critical at the moment, it is as certain as anything can be that the situation will become increasingly intolerable within a very short time. The situation can be controlled, and even reversed; but it demands cooperation on a scale and intensity beyond anything achieved so far.

I realize that there are vital causes to be fought for, and I sympathize with people who work up a passionate concern about the all too many examples of inhumanity, injustice, and unfairness; but behind all this hangs a deadly cloud. Still largely unnoticed and unrecognized, the process of destroying our natural environment is gathering speed and momentum. If we fail to cope with the challenge, the other problems will pale into insignificance.

* Introduction to ``The Population Factor'' section of Down to Earth by HRH Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, 1988.

What has been described as the ``balance of nature'' is simply nature's system of self-limitation. Fertility and breeding success create the surpluses after allowing for the replacement of the losses. Predation, climatic variation, disease, starvation--and in the case of the inappropriately named Homo sapiens, wars and terrorism--are the principal means by which population numbers are kept under some sort of control.

Viewed dispassionately, it must be obvious that the world's human population has grown to such a size that it is threatening its own habitat; and it has already succeeded in causing the extinction of large numbers of wild plant and animal species. Some have simply been killed off. Others have quietly disappeared, as their habitats have been taken over or disturbed by human activities.

Humans are the Greatest Threat to Survival

* Interview with HRH Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, in People Dec. 21, 1981 titled ``Vanishing Breeds Worry Prince Philip, But Not as Much as Overpopulation.''

Q: What do you consider the leading threat to the environment?

A: Human population growth is probably the single most serious long-term threat to survival. We're in for a major disaster if it isn't curbed--not just for the natural world, but for the human world. The more people there are, the more resources they'll consume, the more pollution they'll create, the more fighting they will do. We have no option. If it isn't controlled voluntarily, it will be controlled involuntarily by an increase in disease, starvation and war.

* Address to the Joint Meeting of the All-Party Group on Population and Development and the All-Party Conservation Committee in London, March 11, 1987.

I do believe ... that human population pressure--the sheer number of people on this planet--is the single most important cause of the degradation of the natural environment, of the progressive extinction of wild species of plants and animals, and of the destabilization of the world's climatic and atmospheric systems.

The simple fact is that the human population of the world is consuming natural renewable resources faster than it can regenerate, and the process of exploitation is causing even further damage. If this is already happening with a population of 4 billion, I ask you to imagine what things will be like when the population reaches six and then 10 billion.... All this has been made possible by the industrial revolution and the scientific explosion and it is spread around the world by the new economic religion of development.

* Address at the Salford University Degree Ceremony, July 16, 1973.

There may be disagreements about the time scale, but in principle there can be little doubt that the population cannot go on increasing indefinitely. Resources presently being used will not last for ever and pollution in its broadest sense, unless severely checked, is bound to increase with population and industrial activity.

* Address to All-Party Conservation Committee in London, Feb. 18, 1981.

I suspect that the single most important gift of progress to conservation has been the development of human contraception techniques.

The survival of the "most important"

* Interview with HRH Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, in People magazine, Dec. 21, 1981 titled ``Vanishing Breeds Worry Prince Philip, But Not as Much as Overpopulation.

Q: Is birth control part of the solution?

A: Yes, but you can't legislate these problems away. You've got to get people to understand the need for it: the more important people, the ones who have responsibilities have got to do it because they're at the receiving end. They've got to accept the measures.

* The Chancellor's Lecture, Salford University, June 4, 1982.

As long ago as 1798, Malthus explained what happens when the factors limiting the increase in any population are removed. One of the factors noticed by Darwin was that all species are capable of producing vastly greater populations than can be sustained by existing resources; populations did not increase at the rate at which they are capable was the basis for his theory of Evolution by Natural Selection.

The relevance to natural selection of this capacity for overproduction is that as each individual is slightly different to all the others it is probable that under natural conditions those individuals which happen to be best adapted to the prevailing circumstances have a better chance of survival. Well, so what? Well, take a look at the figures for the human population of this world. One hundred fifty years ago it stood at about 1,000 million or in common parlance today, 1 billion. It then took about a 100 years to double to 2 billion. It took 30 years to add the third billion and 15 years to reach today's total of 4.4 billion. With a present world average rate of growth of 1.8%, the total population by the year 2000 will have increased to an estimated 6 billion and in that and in subsequent years 100 million people will be added to the world population each year. In fact it could be as much as 16 billion by 2045. As a consequence the demand on resources of land alone will mean a third less farm land available and the destruction of half of the present area of productive tropical forest. Bearing in mind the constant reduction of non-renewable resources, there is a strong possibility of growing scarcity and reduction of standards. More people consume more resources. It is as simple as that; and transferring resources and standards from the richer to the poorer countries can only have a marginal effect in the face of this massive increase in the world population.

* Speech at the Margaret Pyke Memorial Trust Dinner in London, Dec. 14 1983.

So long as they [birth control methods] ... remained taboo subjects the chances of making any impression on the human population explosion were that much more remote.

In the introduction to the IUCN Red Data Books which list all animals and plants under threat of extinction, it says that virtually everywhere the major threat to a wild species is loss of habitat to a rapidly increasing human population requiring more space in order to build villages and cities and grow more food. But starvation and poverty cannot be eradicated solely by increased food and resources at the expense of what remains of the natural world. Any increase in the provision of food and resources must be accompanied by a drastic reduction in the rate of increase in the human population.

* Address on Receiving Honorary Degree from the University of Western Ontario, Canada, July 1, 1983.

The industrial revolution sparked the scientific revolution and brought in its wake better public hygiene, better medical care and yet more efficient agriculture. The consequence was a population explosion which still continues today.

The sad fact is that, instead of the same number of people being very much better off, more than twice as many people are just as badly off as they were before. Unfortunately all this well-intentioned development has resulted in an ecological disaster of immense proportions.

* The Chancellor's Lecture, Salford University, June 4, 1982.

The object of the WWF is to ``conserve'' the system as a whole; not to prevent the killing of individual animals. Those who are concerned about their conservation of nature accept that all species are prey to some other species. They accept that most species produce a surplus that is capable of being culled without in any way threatening the survival of the species as a whole.

* A Question of Balance by HRH Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, Michael Russel (Publishing) Ltd., 1982.

It is curious how many philosophers from Plato to Keynes' time have believed in and advocated the control of society by ``philosopher kings.'' According to Plato, ``its kings must be those who have shown the greatest ability in philosophy,'' but--realistically--he added, ``and the greatest aptitude for war.'' Such people may exist in the imagination and occasionally someone with the necessary qualities may briefly dominate the stage of history, but it is a naive appreciation of human nature to imagine that such processed paragons can be invested with the necessary powers and not be tempted to take advantage of their situation.